<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The US Government Wants Your Kids to Be Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrienne</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-60953</link>
		<dc:creator>adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-60953</guid>
		<description>What exactly is a scare tactic? If the information is unquestionably true is it still a scare tactic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is a scare tactic? If the information is unquestionably true is it still a scare tactic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57420</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57420</guid>
		<description>Oops. Last paragraph should read: &quot;I think these advertisements will solve nothing.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. Last paragraph should read: &#8220;I think these advertisements will solve nothing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57419</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57419</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m concerned about the 250 percent. I haven&#039;t had time to read the entire study (it&#039;s 415 pages), but I searched for the figure and found nothing. I read through the respiratory and asthma sections and found nothing that used a figure of 250 percent.

The study began with this, though: Because almost all the data in this review were gathered from observational studies, one should not infer causality based on these findings. Also, there is a wide range of quality of the body of evidence across different health outcomes.

This study probably has some useful information, but just like all studies and statistics, it could be used as a guide but certainly not the absolute last word on anything. It even says as much.

I disagree that women need to be scared by yet another of the umpteen-million things they&#039;re held responsible for regarding the health and welfare of their children. American mothers and fathers are doing the best they can in one of the least family-friendly countries in the world. It&#039;s not mothers who need to be targeted, it&#039;s the community at large.

European countries have wide &quot;community support&quot; for breastfeeding, which contributes to the high percentage of mothers who breastfeed there. They offer support through midwives, physicians, pediatricians and also through an unheard-of-in-America generous family leave of one year, sometimes up to two or more years. (Reducing the need or even the thought of having breastpumps in the workplace.) They generally have shorter workweeks and paid vacation time so family support is greater with the other parent and family members available if they live nearby.

Anyway ... it&#039;s a very complex issue, and I think these advertisements (either the scary ones or the toned-down ones) will solve anything. All it will do is allow people who might be in a position to work for meaningful change to say that they &quot;did something&quot; to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m concerned about the 250 percent. I haven&#8217;t had time to read the entire study (it&#8217;s 415 pages), but I searched for the figure and found nothing. I read through the respiratory and asthma sections and found nothing that used a figure of 250 percent.</p>
<p>The study began with this, though: Because almost all the data in this review were gathered from observational studies, one should not infer causality based on these findings. Also, there is a wide range of quality of the body of evidence across different health outcomes.</p>
<p>This study probably has some useful information, but just like all studies and statistics, it could be used as a guide but certainly not the absolute last word on anything. It even says as much.</p>
<p>I disagree that women need to be scared by yet another of the umpteen-million things they&#8217;re held responsible for regarding the health and welfare of their children. American mothers and fathers are doing the best they can in one of the least family-friendly countries in the world. It&#8217;s not mothers who need to be targeted, it&#8217;s the community at large.</p>
<p>European countries have wide &#8220;community support&#8221; for breastfeeding, which contributes to the high percentage of mothers who breastfeed there. They offer support through midwives, physicians, pediatricians and also through an unheard-of-in-America generous family leave of one year, sometimes up to two or more years. (Reducing the need or even the thought of having breastpumps in the workplace.) They generally have shorter workweeks and paid vacation time so family support is greater with the other parent and family members available if they live nearby.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8230; it&#8217;s a very complex issue, and I think these advertisements (either the scary ones or the toned-down ones) will solve anything. All it will do is allow people who might be in a position to work for meaningful change to say that they &#8220;did something&#8221; to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57397</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57397</guid>
		<description>I agree with campaigns about breastfeeding and I thinks it would be fair if they let the people decide for  themselves. We can&#039;t force people to change their minds by adding meaning to tv adds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with campaigns about breastfeeding and I thinks it would be fair if they let the people decide for  themselves. We can&#8217;t force people to change their minds by adding meaning to tv adds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonja</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57344</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57344</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I don&#039;t believe a lot of what&#039;s being said and I don&#039;t have any &quot;medical&quot; proof or &quot;scientific&quot; proof, but then look how the goverments fooled you with that. 

All I have is my own personal proof. I have two children. My oldest was breastfed for about 5 days. He has NO health problems whatsoever. My youngest was breastfed for almost 6 months and has allergies and asthma up the yang and was always sick as a child and in the hosptial twice!! 

Now, for more &quot;whateveryouwanttocallit&quot; proof... I run a daycare and my helper and I just roll our eyes when a breastfed child enrolls because we know they&#039;ll be the sickest kids at daycare. Sorry, but it&#039;s true... or, is it a coincidence? 

I don&#039;t believe in the studies because they&#039;re not foolproof!!!

I&#039;m SO sick of this breast/formula debate... why don&#039;t women just do what&#039;s right for THEM and everyone else mind their own darn business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t believe a lot of what&#8217;s being said and I don&#8217;t have any &#8220;medical&#8221; proof or &#8220;scientific&#8221; proof, but then look how the goverments fooled you with that. </p>
<p>All I have is my own personal proof. I have two children. My oldest was breastfed for about 5 days. He has NO health problems whatsoever. My youngest was breastfed for almost 6 months and has allergies and asthma up the yang and was always sick as a child and in the hosptial twice!! </p>
<p>Now, for more &#8220;whateveryouwanttocallit&#8221; proof&#8230; I run a daycare and my helper and I just roll our eyes when a breastfed child enrolls because we know they&#8217;ll be the sickest kids at daycare. Sorry, but it&#8217;s true&#8230; or, is it a coincidence? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe in the studies because they&#8217;re not foolproof!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m SO sick of this breast/formula debate&#8230; why don&#8217;t women just do what&#8217;s right for THEM and everyone else mind their own darn business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geri</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57155</link>
		<dc:creator>Geri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 05:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57155</guid>
		<description>I still think breast milk is best for babies. However, we can&#039;t just force someone to believe the facts, especially if they have a different belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think breast milk is best for babies. However, we can&#8217;t just force someone to believe the facts, especially if they have a different belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57143</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57143</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;ve been mulling this over, and I just can&#039;t buy into the usefulness of the ads without major policy changes to support women and breastfeeding.  I don&#039;t know anyone, anywhere who ever says that breastfeeding is not the best.  I think that we all agree on that.  The key is how to make it happen.  When at least ten states ban breastfeeding in public, it is pretty hard to breastfeed.  On top of that, even though no should feel ashamed of breastfeeding in public, many women do, and yet there are not many options for women who want a semi-private, comfortable clean space  when they are out with their babies.  On top of that, there is nowhere near enough support for those times when the baby is crying and crying and can&#039;t latch on.  And then there&#039;s the trick of working mothers.  When do women in service industries get time off to pump?  

Scaring women into breastfeeding is only effective when women can actually make good on the opportunity to breastfeed.  Otherwise, it just leaves people feeling worse about their parenting skills in situations where their opportunities are severely constrained.  I think that&#039;s the reality many women face, and in many cases, why some women who would breastfeed are not doing so.  Ads alone can&#039;t change that, but public campaigns can and should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve been mulling this over, and I just can&#8217;t buy into the usefulness of the ads without major policy changes to support women and breastfeeding.  I don&#8217;t know anyone, anywhere who ever says that breastfeeding is not the best.  I think that we all agree on that.  The key is how to make it happen.  When at least ten states ban breastfeeding in public, it is pretty hard to breastfeed.  On top of that, even though no should feel ashamed of breastfeeding in public, many women do, and yet there are not many options for women who want a semi-private, comfortable clean space  when they are out with their babies.  On top of that, there is nowhere near enough support for those times when the baby is crying and crying and can&#8217;t latch on.  And then there&#8217;s the trick of working mothers.  When do women in service industries get time off to pump?  </p>
<p>Scaring women into breastfeeding is only effective when women can actually make good on the opportunity to breastfeed.  Otherwise, it just leaves people feeling worse about their parenting skills in situations where their opportunities are severely constrained.  I think that&#8217;s the reality many women face, and in many cases, why some women who would breastfeed are not doing so.  Ads alone can&#8217;t change that, but public campaigns can and should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen of Spain</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57044</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen of Spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57044</guid>
		<description>That figure is from the Ads-you know...the study that was &quot;buried.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That figure is from the Ads-you know&#8230;the study that was &#8220;buried.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisse</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-57042</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-57042</guid>
		<description>In considering later health issues like obesity, heart disease, asthma, etc., I&#039;d be willing to bet that the 250% figure you quoted did not take into account other factors such as later diet, excercise, hours of TV viewing, and other environmental concerns beyond the families&#039; control. Instead it puts the blame entirely on the mother.

It&#039;s just another way of infantilizing women, saying to them &quot;we don&#039;t trust you to do the best you can.&quot; I think the scare tactics are only going to hit the women who tried and failed.

I never had an infant, so maybe I missed all those ads encouraging breastfeeding in a positive, healthful, bond with your baby kind of way. I agree that breastfeeding should be promoted, and I think it is beyond shameful that the report was buried (this, actually, may be the most important part of your post and your future efforts). I just really disagree that scare tactics are the best way to reach out to new mothers. We&#039;re scared enough.

I think some of the more positive suggestions: hospital guidance, lactivation consultants, tax breaks for family-friendly maternity leave policies, would be far more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In considering later health issues like obesity, heart disease, asthma, etc., I&#8217;d be willing to bet that the 250% figure you quoted did not take into account other factors such as later diet, excercise, hours of TV viewing, and other environmental concerns beyond the families&#8217; control. Instead it puts the blame entirely on the mother.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just another way of infantilizing women, saying to them &#8220;we don&#8217;t trust you to do the best you can.&#8221; I think the scare tactics are only going to hit the women who tried and failed.</p>
<p>I never had an infant, so maybe I missed all those ads encouraging breastfeeding in a positive, healthful, bond with your baby kind of way. I agree that breastfeeding should be promoted, and I think it is beyond shameful that the report was buried (this, actually, may be the most important part of your post and your future efforts). I just really disagree that scare tactics are the best way to reach out to new mothers. We&#8217;re scared enough.</p>
<p>I think some of the more positive suggestions: hospital guidance, lactivation consultants, tax breaks for family-friendly maternity leave policies, would be far more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer</title>
		<link>http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/comment-page-1/#comment-56944</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofspainblog.com/2007/08/31/the-us-government-wants-your-kids-to-be-sick/#comment-56944</guid>
		<description>But as long as we are told &quot;formula is just as good&quot; and as long as women are willing to take what they get companies won&#039;t have to give more maturnity leave or a place to pump. Why should they? The majority of moms just use formula soif you&#039;re an inconvenience they&#039;ll find another mom who won&#039;t be. Get pissed! Get angry! Get pumped up! The more moms that understand what is at stake by not breastfeeding the more moms will be putting pressure to get what they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But as long as we are told &#8220;formula is just as good&#8221; and as long as women are willing to take what they get companies won&#8217;t have to give more maturnity leave or a place to pump. Why should they? The majority of moms just use formula soif you&#8217;re an inconvenience they&#8217;ll find another mom who won&#8217;t be. Get pissed! Get angry! Get pumped up! The more moms that understand what is at stake by not breastfeeding the more moms will be putting pressure to get what they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

